William James asks: ‘Why do we spend years straining after a certain sci-
entific or practical problem, but all in vain — thought refusing to evolve
the solution we desire? And why, some day, walking in the street with our
attention miles away from the quest, does the answer saunter into our
minds as carelessly as if it had never been called for — suggested possibly
by the flowers on the bonnet of the lady in front of us, or possibly by noth-
ing that we can discover? If reason can give us relief then, why did she not
do so sooner?
Henri Poincare, when talking about the creative process, says, ‘Often
when one works at a hard question, nothing good is accomplished at the
first attack. Then one takes a long rest and sits down anew to the work.
During the first half-hour, as before, nothing is found, and then all of a
sudden the decisive idea presents itself to the mind.’ This sequence of events
is not only evident in scientific quests — similar descriptions are found in
religious quests — for example, as described by (Saint) Theresa of Avila or
(Saint) John of the Cross. In religion, it may be described as ‘insight’; in sci-
entific circles it may be described as creativity.
Renowned physicist, Helmholtz, admitted that often his ideas ar-
rived suddenly, without any effort on his part, while taking easy walks over
wooded hills in sunny weather. Physicist Lord Kelvin reported receiving
inspiration in similar ways. He sometimes had to devise explanations for
deductions that came to him in a flash of intuition. Gauss described how a
solution came to him for an arithmetical theorem that he had spent years
trying to prove — like a sudden flash of lightning the riddle happened to be
solved. Henri Poincare, the famous mathematician, says that the appear-
ances of sudden illuminations are obvious indications of a long course of
previous unconscious work. Before and after, there had to be controlled
conscious work, but in between was some mysterious process. In a letter
to a French scientific journal in 1886, referring to an arithmetic theorem,
the proof of which eluded him for years, Gauss writes, ‘Two days ago, I suc-
ceeded, not on account of my painful efforts, but by the grace of God. Like
a sudden flash of lightning, the riddle happened to be solved.’2
No comments:
Post a Comment